Despite multiple studies, there is currently limited agreement on the impact of weather conditions on transmission rates of COVID-19.
We assembled one of the largest datasets of COVID-19 infection and weather and analyzed the impact of weather on the transmission of the virus across 3,739 global locations. For details on the methodology, data, and estimated statistical models, see our published article

We have developed interactive figures to visualize evidence-based projections of the impact of weather on the potential transmission rate of COVID-19 from May 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021, using 2019-2020 weather data for each location. 

See also interactive visualizations based on our results in The New York Times.

Projecting How Weather and Air Pollutants Impact Transmission RateThis animation shows the progression of the weather's projected impact on the transmission of COVID-19

Reproductive number, the average number of individuals infected by each infectious person, is key to understanding transmission of diseases. Absent prior immunity and policy responses, this number is estimated to be in the range of 2-3 for COVID-19 across many locations, leading to rapid growth in the number of cases. Figures below show how that number is impacted by weather and air pollutants in each location, captured in the Relative COVID-19 Risk due to Weather and Air Pollution (CRW). CRW compares the relative changes in reproductive number for the disease due to weather factors (average and diurnal temperature, ultraviolet (UV) index, humidity, pressure, precipitation) and air pollutants (SO2 and Ozone). For example, a shift over a season in CRW from 1 (the 95 percentile in our sample) to 0.7 in a given location points to a 30% reduction in estimated reproduction number over that period due to weather and air pollutants (i.e. assuming everything else is constant).

We project the CRW for the next year across the world using weather data (averaged over a moving window of 15 days) from 2019 period. Our projections suggest warmer times of the year, and locations, may offer a modest reduction in reproductive number, helping with efforts to contain the pandemic and build response capacity. Outdoor UV is also associated with lower transmission up to a point (index of ~6.5), but above the effect reverses, creating an overall U-shaped relationship. Pressure, precipitation, diurnal temperature, lack of humidity, SO2 and Ozone all modestly contribute to increased transmission rates. Overall, CRW numbers rarely go below 0.5 or abouve 1.5, indicating that upcoming changes in weather alone will not be enough to fully contain the transmission of COVID-19.  

Our projections suggest warmer temperature and moderate outdoor UV exposure may offer a modest reduction in reproductive number; however, upcoming changes in weather alone will NOT be enough to fully contain the transmission of COVID-19. 

Important Note: CRW numbers do NOT reflect the total risks of COVID-19 across different locations, rather, only the portion of the risk due to weather and air pollutants. Beyond weather, those risks depend on population density, cultural practices, individual and policy responses, and a host of other factors not included in our projections (but controlled for in our estimation using fixed effects and location-specific trends). Therefore, comparisons between locations are only informative about the relative impact of weather on transmission, keeping everything else constant.

(Projection tools are best viewed on desktop or tablet)