Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization

Citation:

M Zenati, HA Cohen, and BP Griffith. 1999. “Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization.” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 117, 3, Pp. 439-44; discussion 444-6.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Integrated coronary revascularization combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) with left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that integrated coronary revascularization could result in successful revascularization in suitable patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: Between September 1996 and January 1998, 31 consecutive patients underwent integrated coronary revascularization. Twenty-two were male; mean age was 69 years (46-86 years) and 42% were older than 75 years. Eight patients (26%) had a Parsonnet score greater than 20%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.3% +/- 12%; 6 patients (19%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%. RESULTS: The anastomosis time for MICABG with the internal thoracic artery was 14.6 +/- 5.2 minutes and the operating time was 105 +/- 20 minutes; 28 patients (90%) were extubated in the operating room. The internal thoracic artery anastomosis was patent in all 31 patients (100%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed before MICABG in 2 patients (7%), on the same day of MICABG in 16 patients (52%), on postoperative day 1 in 3 patients (9%), and on postoperative days 2 to 4 in 10 patients (32%). Postprocedure length of stay in the hospital was 2.7 +/- 1.0 days and 13 patients (42%) were discharged home on postoperative day 1 or 2. Three patients (9.6%) required repeat target vessel revascularization in the distribution of the previous percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients are alive without angina at a follow-up of 10.8 +/- 3.8 months. CONCLUSION: Our early results demonstrate that integrated coronary revascularization can be performed safely and effectively. Long-term results will be available from a prospective randomized trial now underway to compare integrated coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.